Not sure? Read the voter guide to parking issues
The dark, high-risk hours (pre-sunrise) of winter increase pedestrian risk due to blind spots, narrow roads, and low visibility for commuters and students walking to school/transit.
Emergency Vehicle access to streets after storm.
Ensure streets are clear
Preserve clear street during the high-risk commute. If no cars overnight few cars in early morning.
Prevent dangerous blind spots from parked cars that endanger children and commuters.
Guarantee unimpeded emergency access limiting parked cars after snowstorms and during morning commute.
Reactive solution to declare Snow
Emergency when storm is active, requiring last-minute enforcement, ignoring storm residual dangers of snow banks and winter hazards of black ice, and darkness which are created by parked cars during morning commute. Promises future regulation for safety only when problems are discovered.
New housing developments contain inadequate or no off-street parking.
Developer Incentive for offstreet parking: Overnight parking restrictions prevent developers and landlords from claiming that residents can park elsewhere requiring them to provide adequate off-street parking. This prevents Boston-style clogged streets, with only a nominal 4 hour, 4 month parking restriction.
Allows developers to build housing without off-street parking immediately shifting parking to neighborhood streets as residents with expensive or inconvenient choose free parking off-street. Creates incentive for landlords and developers to not provide parking (which is expensive for them). Promise of better regulation when overuse of the street parking occurs, too late as more need has been created.
Current parking management lacks the nuance and flexibility required to address resident hardship while
preventing non-residents (college students) and residents abandoning expensive or inconvenient off-street parking.
The MBTA act and residential development have increased
competition for parking by allowing building without adequate off-street parking. We support compassionate solutions for residents with need: permits, opening municipal lots/schools, and private business incentives.
Quick Fix removing all restrictions on overnight parking, which will increase demand and lead to visible parking scarcity in many neighborhoods. The repeal comes with a promise to create regulations once problems become widespread, by then it may be too late to reverse the impact. Creating new regulations is a slow process done street-by-street typically 3-6 months per street. The resulting rules are likely more restrictive than the winter ban since the problems will have grown larger and become more entrenched.
Current parking management lacks the nuance and flexibility required to address resident hardship while protecting public safety and resource allocation.
Preserve Regulatory Control: The No vote retains the essential policy tool needed to manage MBTA act and development pressures and creates the pathway for compassionate overnight parking solutions (permits, lot access, incentives). Don't create a policy vacuum.
Policy Vacuum: Repeals the core regulatory tool immediately. Promise of future regulations when discovered which require a slow, street-by-street re-regulation process (3-6 months per street).
Our approach is to help those with present need and prevent the numbers of people with need from increasing by holding developers and landlords accountable for parking needs which means we support compassionate solutions for residents with need including: permits, opening municipal lots/schools, and private business incentives.
Future Regulation: A weak promise to fix problems if any occur. A slow, street-by-street re-regulation to solve problems created by the repeal.
Keep our streets safe and accessible for all.
Maintain cleaner streets for critical emergency vehicles:
ambulances, fire trucks and police cars